Bigbruin.com
Home :: Reviews & Articles ::
Forum :: Info :: :: Facebook :: Twitter :: Youtube :: RSS Feed
Crucial MX100 256GB Solid State Drive
Author: Jason Kohrs
Manufacturer: Crucial
Source: Crucial
Purchase: Amazon.com
Comment or Question: Post Here
Page: 2 of 5 [ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
Review Icon
November 20, 2014

The Basics:

The images below show the 256GB Crucial MX100 once removed from the packaging. It features a rough-textured, silver-colored metal housing with a label that describes it merely as Crucial MX 2.5 inch solid state drive. Around back you get far more information on the model, capacity, speeds, and a rather epic number of certification markings.

Review Image Review Image


The next image shows the SSD next to the rather simple adapter provided to increase the thickness to 9.5mm This black plastic frame is self-adhesive so you can just stick it to the drive, and have it fit much more snugly in larger drive bays on your laptop, etc.

Review Image


Installation and Operation:

The 256GB Crucial MX100 was installed in a Windows 7 64-Bit desktop computer using a SYBA 4-port mSATA PCI Express controller. This device lets me run up to four additional SATA drives at once, with a mix of mSATA and traditional SATA drives being possible. I find the transfer rates to be very impressive on this card, especially since it puts the drive running the OS on a different controller than the drives to be tested.

Promo Image

Once connected, the system was powered up and the screenshot below was taken from CrystalDiskInfo to confirm the details.

Review Image


Testing:

CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64:

As a warm up, a run of CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 was executed on the Crucial MX100 256GB SSD to see if we were getting about the right speeds. While we see that the read speeds are a little lower than expected, the write speeds are a little higher... which I have found to be about the case with this benchmark. These results were achieved with CrystalDiskMark set to "0 Fill", which simulates compressible data being transferred. When CrystalDiskMark was run in the default state, the results were much slower with reads in the high 300MB/s range and write speeds in the high 200MB/s range.

Review Image

« Back :: 1 :: 2 :: 3 :: 4 :: 5 :: Next »
Recent Content
» Content Index

Advertisement

Recent Discussions
» Forum Index

Bruin Tracks
» Mostly Useless Free Image Host
» eBay - Shop Victoriously!
» New and Interesting Finds on Amazon
» New Year, New Gear at MonopriceMonoprice
» Advertise with Bigbruin.com
» Bigbruin.com Content RSS Feed
» Other Links

Contact Us :: On Facebook :: On Twitter :: On Youtube :: Newsletter :: RSS Feed :: Links :: Sponsors :: Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2000 - 2018 Bigbruin.com - All rights reserved