Testing (continued):
PassMark Performance Test v6.1 is the next benchmark up for consideration. It offers a suite of tests which can be used to analyze the performance of most system components. The data provided below is their composite "Memory Mark" value, which is an overall indication of memory performance based on other tests executed. Higher numbers are better for this unitless value.
Again we see that if for some reason you were considering this kit for 1333MHz operation that you wouldn't be making the best choice. At 1600MHz the performance is better than that of the competition, and a slight overclock nets another sizeable gain.
The last set of tests to consider are FutureMark's rather popular PCMark05 and 3DMark06. Only the Memory Score from PCMark05's suite was considered, and for 3DMark06 the system was configured to run at 1440x900, no anti-aliasing, and optimal filtering.
This is the first situation where the Patriot kit is not the clear cut leader at 1600MHz. The results are extremely close, and nothing to be upset about, but the Crucial kit did put a few more 'Marks' on the board despite having looser timings. Overclocking the Patriot kit helps it regain its edge, but it should be noted that while the bulk of tests are taking an isolated look at the memory, 3DMark06 does rely on the GPU and CPU, as well. Results from different speeds are not only influenced by the memory speed increase, but also the CPU speed increase.
|
|
