View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
evilburl Canadian eh
Joined: 20 Nov 2003 Posts: 346 Location: I have no idea
|
Posted: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:54:42 Post Subject: |
|
|
Kinda sorta yes,, but they are definately not a "ford" _________________ A8N SLI Premium, 64 - 3700, 160g sata hd, 1 GB 3200 cl 2.5, Asus Extreme EN7800GT, 19" Acicero and win xp
PMS stands for:Perissable Man-Slaughter, Preposterous Mood Swings, or Punish My Spouse
. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
Dud3! Forum abandoner
Joined: 21 Aug 2003 Posts: 1469 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:42:14 Post Subject: |
|
|
That's funny, the good to crap ratio is pretty high for new GMs compared with Ford. My aunt's Chevy Venture is the biggest POS I've ever seen, the Aztec, Avalanche, four-inches-between-body-panels Saturns, semi-ugly new trucks, etc don't make them look very good.
Not that I would argue Ford vs Chevy, they both have their good points, I just think new Ford quality is a bit higher than new GM quality (by new I mean anything after say, 1996).
Now, go back a few years to the '80s and I'd take either one when it came to trucks and Broncos/Blazers (although I love Broncos), go back even farther to the '60s and '70s and I would be Chevy all the way.
Despite what I may think about GM's other offerings, let's face it, the Corvette has always been better than the Mustang and 2005 is no exception, the new Mustang is a joke and the new Corvette is faster and sexier than the last.
When it comes to trucks, there's nothing better than a Toyota in the light truck world, and for real trucks (one ton) a nice Dodge turbo diesel dually will best everything else out there.
Anyway, to me Ford vs Chevy is like North vs South Civil War crap, they're the same thing, American. You can argue which is best all day long because they're so similar. Try argueing Ford vs Porsche, Chevy vs Ferrari, any arguements there? I don't think so. _________________ Due to a not-that-interesting turn of events, I am now known as Justin Danger. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nookie420 Rated NC-17
Joined: 09 Oct 2003 Posts: 157 Location: ST Louis MO
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dadx2mj Happy Camper
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Posts: 2994 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:00:20 Post Subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Despite what I may think about GM's other offerings, let's face it, the Corvette has always been better than the Mustang and 2005 is no exception, the new Mustang is a joke and the new Corvette is faster and sexier than the last. |
That is like comparing fillet mignon to hamburger. The Mustang was never meant to compete with a Corvette but more so the Camaro. A better comparison today would be the new Vette against the new Ford GT. Even though the GT costs tons more it is a more valid comparison.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IceNine *The Freshest*
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1459 Location: Bel Air
|
Posted: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:05:40 Post Subject: |
|
|
I disagree dad. If I may call you that. Remember what happened in the Vette vs. Thunderbird battle? The bird got flipped, yo. It eventually became a weak grandma car, whereas the Vette became stronger. The Mustang later had to compete because Ford offered nothing else, despite the pricetag and performance differences.
Further proof was a commercial I saw with Mr. Ford (the current CEO?) talking about his favorite memories and his Mustang with a "Throaty V8".
However, you are right. Now that the GT is out, I mean _________________
A letter to a soldier |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dadx2mj Happy Camper
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Posts: 2994 Location: SoCal
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IceNine *The Freshest*
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1459 Location: Bel Air
|
Posted: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:31:48 Post Subject: |
|
|
Given, I've never seen a stock Mustang vs a Vette, but I've seen many Cobra vs Vette articles.
Don't get me wrong. I think the Mustang is a total piece of s#!7 and it was a huge mistake for Ford to have relied on it for so long. _________________
A letter to a soldier |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
JimBowy Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2003 Posts: 1627
|
Posted: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:20:24 Post Subject: |
|
|
dadx2mj wrote: | Quote: | Despite what I may think about GM's other offerings, let's face it, the Corvette has always been better than the Mustang and 2005 is no exception, the new Mustang is a joke and the new Corvette is faster and sexier than the last. |
That is like comparing fillet mignon to hamburger. The Mustang was never meant to compete with a Corvette but more so the Camaro. A better comparison today would be the new Vette against the new Ford GT. Even though the GT costs tons more it is a more valid comparison.
|
your comparing a Ford GT to a Vette? LOL How can you do that.... its no comparison. Maybe a Mustang Cobra to a Vette but a $150,000 Ford Gt that can compete with Porshe/Lambo/etc.? Please..... _________________ - Jim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dadx2mj Happy Camper
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Posts: 2994 Location: SoCal
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IceNine *The Freshest*
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1459 Location: Bel Air
|
Posted: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:04:29 Post Subject: |
|
|
dadx2mj wrote: | You are right though the GT is a step above the Vette but in my opinion still a better comparison than a Mustang to a Vette. |
I agree... After all, no "sports car" should have back seats. _________________
A letter to a soldier |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|