View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
swolodkin Rated PG
Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 1 Location: United States
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
acruxksa Doh!
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 1051 Location: The Cradle of Storms
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:00:23 Post Subject: |
|
|
Swolodkin,
I would be concerned about using this device in a mission critical environment. I have no trouble recommending this enclosure to the average consumer for file and media storage. However, I'm hesitant to recommend it for commercial use primarily because I have no idea how large the company is and what kind of traffic volume we are talking about. Typically hardware developed for commercial use will offer redundancy in more than just their data (power supplies and cooling fans). To be honest it sounds like a temporary solution to the problem and I'm not sure it's the best place to save a couple $$$.
In a RAID 1 configuration it should be fast enough assuming we are talking about a small business with a modest number of transactions, it just doesn't have the needed hardware redundancy you should have for the type of use you're proposing. I'm not an exchange guru, but it's my understanding that the transaction logs can be essential to repairing databases if you have a failure. I guess it all depends on just how important the company thinks their databases are.
I would also add that it's better to separate the transaction logs from the databases, so if they won't be able to do this unless they use the Mapower enclosure, then it's probably better than nothing, but If life has taught me anything it's that you can tell them a hundred times that it's only a temporary solution, but as soon as it's installed and working they will forget all about finding something better until it fails. Then no one will remember you telling them it was temporary. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dfreak Rated PG
Joined: 03 Dec 2008 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:06:37 Post Subject: |
|
|
Hi, here I am again
My TB32 worked fine until a few days ago . When I started up the enclosure, it starts to do a Disk Rebuild (Middle LED: Blinking blue + red on). But after about 20 seconds the Power LED becomes purple (HDD volume degradation) and the middle LED is blinking blue + blinking red (error state). I tried everything: removed all partitions, tried other modes: I always used SAFE50 mode, so I tried also another mode: SAFE33 and RAID1; these 2 also don't work.
All other modes (SPAN, Normal, RAID0) just work fine. So every mode which involves RAID1 doesn't work... Is it possible that the RAID controller of the enclosure is defect?
Dfreak |
|
Back to top |
|
|
acruxksa Doh!
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 1051 Location: The Cradle of Storms
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:08:12 Post Subject: |
|
|
It is possible, but I'd be more inclined to think there's a hard drive issue. Especially since the other modes still work. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TS1981 Rated PG
Joined: 22 Apr 2009 Posts: 3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TS1981 Rated PG
Joined: 22 Apr 2009 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:37:01 Post Subject: |
|
|
It lasts to provide 5 hours a RAID1 with 2 1TB HDD. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
acruxksa Doh!
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 1051 Location: The Cradle of Storms
|
Posted: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:12:25 Post Subject: |
|
|
TS1981 wrote: | It lasts to provide 5 hours a RAID1 with 2 1TB HDD. |
TS198,
Did your enclosure work at one point and then quite working? I'm not clear on what the issue was for you. Raid-1 systems take several hours to build with the larger hard drives and both Safe 33 and Safe 50 have raid-1 partitions, so they take quite awhile to build also.
Dfreaks situation seemed to be that hes system worked fine one minute and then stopped working, the first thing to suspect here is some sort of error on one of the drives. I'm not sure it in fact that was his problem though because he never posted back. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
TS1981 Rated PG
Joined: 22 Apr 2009 Posts: 3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
acruxksa Doh!
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 1051 Location: The Cradle of Storms
|
Posted: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:39:29 Post Subject: |
|
|
TS1981 wrote: | I had not counted on which lasts it so for a long time. I am accustomed it, which a structure of a RAID1 lasts a few seconds.
But it seems now to function. All LEDs show that it its work fine. |
It essentially does a bit for bit copy from drive 0 to drive 1 even if both drives are blank (It's copying all those zero's to a drive filled with zero's ), which can take an awful long time if your talking hundreds of gigabytes.
There are probably better implementations, but not at this price. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dfreak Rated PG
Joined: 03 Dec 2008 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:49:57 Post Subject: |
|
|
I thought it was working fine in the normal, span, ... modes, but it didn't, when you started copying, it failed after a couple of minutes. So I took out the drives and tested them both with HDtune, the result: one of the drives had lots of corrupted clusters. So I did a RTM and 2 days later I received already a new one. I placed it into the TB32, started to copy and after a couple of hours it was finished.
Happy end. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|