View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Doctor Feelgood Arrrrghh!
Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 20349 Location: New Jersey
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
Mastakilla Rated PG
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:02:46 Post Subject: |
|
|
very kewl article
i really like the idea
there is one thing i think that should be done differently though
i know lots of people actively cool the PWM-IC area and the RAM which is nearby the cpu fan...
also for me this brings a huge stabilty increase when overclocking...
without active cooling i could clock to maximum 10x241Mhz and 10x246 allmost stable
with VERY active cooling on that area (loud 120mm fan) i could go as high as 10x260Mhz (i have a winchester 3200+ with a sucky memcontroller)
now this was all with a amd boxed cooler which, like yours, cools the RAM and PWM-IC area ALOT too...
i currently run 10x241mhz without active cooling, since i coulnt stand the noise
in the future i wanted to go for watercooling, and i would expect a major difference of heat of the RAM or the PWM-IC area
so actually i am more intrested in thermal pics of a watercooled system then an aircooled system (AND sucky airflow would even be better to show the problem areas )
i also heart some people ask about the difference when u use the 4V option for the RAM on the DFI board (for which u would prolly need to test with some UTT or BH-5 mem)
personally i dont need those pics with my corsair 4400C25 mem @ 2.6V but if u wanne be really complete...
but still, very nice article, hope to see a followup soon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HackaX0rus Rated XXX
Joined: 20 Jan 2005 Posts: 1972 Location: Cen. CA
|
Posted: Wed, 25 May 2005 22:41:59 Post Subject: |
|
|
very nice spire...i see you busted out your works thermal cam again ...hats off to you too asylum. _________________ Ignore this^^ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
metro Rated PG
Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BOMBOVA Rated PG
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 1 Location: Vancouver BC.CA
|
Posted: Tue, 31 May 2005 22:39:24 Post Subject: |
|
|
[B]
I am in awe, of a few of the very hot spots your
thermal viewer photos reveal.
On occasion, I have used a temperature probe with readout.
Now your photos show myself, where i should try **
because I have missed some. My feeling over the years is that
the hot spots are areas of potential failure, or early failure, or
areas where performance could be degraded.
With disposable Motherboards , the cost to repair is high...
one can go for the best stable point for the best of performance..
That sort of raises the question 1. Just what is a stable point
for an overclock board. It seems, the maximum heat, that can be
sustained over a prolonged periond of use, * Like continually in
a RSS mode. OR ! ? The photos do amaze me. Thanks... _________________ RTG. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asylum Joshzilla
Joined: 03 Feb 2005 Posts: 1142 Location: Suburbs of BFE
|
Posted: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:17:59 Post Subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the comments everyone.
It is possible to take some additional photos in the future, although it is a difficult proceedure for just a couple photos at a time. Perhaps after i do some mods or upgrades? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spire Hall Pass B!tch!!!
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 2165 Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
Doctor Feelgood Arrrrghh!
Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 20349 Location: New Jersey
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tijgert Rated PG
Joined: 25 Dec 2005 Posts: 2 Location: Amsterdam
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spire Hall Pass B!tch!!!
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 2165 Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|