| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Blue|Fusion
Rated XXX
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 441
Location: Cleveland, OH
|
 Posted: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:01:33 Post Subject: 10 Reasons Why I'm Not Buying Windows Vista |
  |
|
(just thought I'd throw this up here for some of you MS diehards to flame me for :) )
10 Reasons Why I'm Not Buying Windows Vista (In No Particular Order)
1) End User License Agreement (EULA)
Of course, there's a license included with proprietary software. I don't have a problem with the fact that there is a license, but with some of the terms of the license. I recently read an article at The Register about several relatively disturbing clauses that should make PC enthusiast like myself absolutely irate.
Clause 15 of the Vista EULA - REASSIGN TO ANOTHER DEVICE - reads as follows:
| Quote: | a. Software Other than Windows Anytime Upgrade. The first user of the software may reassign the license to another device one time. If you reassign the license, that other device becomes the "licensed device."
b. Windows Anytime Upgrade Software. The first user of the software may reassign the license to another device one time, but only if the license terms of the software you upgraded from allows reassignment. |
What does this mean to you? Well, if you are the type of person who likes to build your own computer, you can only reassign your Vista license from your old computer to your new one once. What's worse? Try just upgrading your motherboard more than once. If you like to stay on the competitive edge with gaming, you'll be paying as much for Windows licenses as you do for hardware upgrades over the same time.
2) Too Many Versions To Choose From
Windows Vista is going to be released with no less than seven different editions, whereas there are currently three Windows XP variants (not including the differential 32-bit vs. 64-bit platforms). Windows Vista Business, Small Business, Enterprise, Home Premium, Home Basic, Ultimate, Starter.
So I want a little bit of the Home Premium features, but I also want just parts of the Business edition...what do I do?! Well, you can buy the Windows Vista Ultimate edition which includes the best of both worlds. But wait! Do you have $399 to shell out for each license? You probably do, but is it really worth it? I don't know what your needs are, but I know that $400 is much better spent on new hardware and not on an Operating System.
3) Cost
As I touched on in the last reason, the cost of each Vista license is going to cost you a pretty penny. A full copy of Vista Home Basic will cost you $299. For that price, you can buy a new Intel Core 2 Duo processor. The prices just go up from there.
4) Aero, Searching, and Sidebar Gadgets, etc. are Old News
So Vista has this neat looking Aero graphical user interface (GUI). That's great, but whoop-dee-doo. The transparent windows and menus are old news. I have transparent windows, menus, and then some on my Linux desktop (using the KDE GUI). What's better? It doesn't require powerful hardware. In fact, I run the same transparency effects on a Pentium II 350MHz computer with 128MB RAM and an integrated video controller. Vista's installer probably won't even run on that.
When it comes to the file searching and organization, what's so special about this in Vista? Nothing. Years ago when Microsoft began releasing the information on Vista (then “Longhorn”), they were bragging about their WinFS file system that was to be used for better file indexing and fast searches. Well, WinFS was pulled from the Vista features and NTFS is going to be, once again, the default file system. Little performance improvements were made. The only noticeable addition is the ability to create symbolic links (a.k.a. symlinks), something *NIX file systems had for years.
So what about the sidebar gadgets? Again, they're nothing to brag about. Linux GUIs and Mac OS X had them for years.
5) Hardware Requirements
I'm sure you've all heard the phrases “Windows Vista Capable,” “Essential Vista,” and “Vista Ready” from hardware manufacturers and OEM computer suppliers such as Dell. If you bought a cheaper system this time last year from an OEM like Dell, chances are, you're SOL when it comes to upgrading to Vista. You are probably running with an Integrated Graphics Controller which will not cut if for Vista. That $400 you spent...not “Vista Capable.”
Why is this so? Well, Vista requires a vast amount of processing power, memory, and graphics card technology – and that's just to run Aero, the graphical user interface of Vista that makes it look all pretty! Think of what resources are left for your games, Photoshop, and your video editing software.
6) Security
It may be a newer version of Windows, but it's still Windows. If you've ever used a computer, you know that Windows is extremely vulnerable to exploits, virii, trojans, spyware, adware, and more. To make yourself feel more secure, you probably install an anti-virus program, an anti-spyware/adware program, and a firewall. Even so, you always have that voice in the back of your head saying such things like “Be careful, there's hackers afoot.”, “That site may have spyware!”, or “Is it safe to download this program?”. Vista will be no different.
Vista did add some new security features into Vista, such as some new Internet Explorer 7 options and some better userland security applications such as the Windows Malicious Program Remover (which is also on updated Windows XP machines) and the Microsoft One Care for anti-virus, anti-spyware, and a few other things. But another gotcha from the wonderful people at Microsoft! The Microsoft One Care program will cost you extra, just as other anti-virus applications, such as Norton do. I still fail to see all the built-in security they're all hyped up about.
7) Shorter Laptop Battery Lifetime
For those of you with laptops, you'll be seeing a decrease in battery charge life instead of an increase. This has to relate with the increase in resource usage (mainly graphics) that Vista will require. The graphics card in your laptop will be in -D mode which increases the GPU and memory clock rates as well as their respective voltages – In layman's terms, the hardware hogs more power to make Vista's Aero work.
8) Closed Source
Well, most proprietary software is closed source, so what can you do? Not use proprietary software. Why does this matter to me? Well, there's a few reasons. Open Source allows community-based programming. Anyone can get Open Source code, modify it, customize it, fix something, add new features, and improve it. This allows more efficient, cleaner, and more stable code. Because of this community-based effort, Open Source allows the development and addition of new improvements, features, and bug fixes to be done at a much faster rate. This is why *NIX and BSD-based Mac OS X operating systems are actually ahead of Microsoft in terms of stability, performance, features, and technologies.
9) Useless Features
Some of the features I pointed out previously, although entertaining, are pretty much completely useless for both home and office users. Sure, they may be nice to have, but there is no feasible way that all of those added features combined can be worth $200 or more. I don't need to share photos that badly. I don't ever use the search feature, let alone have a need for it to be right on my desktop. I don't have a need for a 3-D desktop. And even if I did, I already have one – AND IT'S 100% FREE OF CHARGE!
10) Digital Rights Management (DRM)
I don't support illegal file sharing, but I do strongly oppose Microsoft limiting what programs I can and cannot install or what files I open. I like to maintain control over my own computer, not the other way around.
Furthermore than just trying to limit propriety, Microsoft-Authorized software only, Vista's DRM software degrades the quality of High Definition DVDs unless you have a television or monitor with this special DRM technology embedded into it. Again, this means buying more to get something that Microsoft should have no control over.
-----
I won't lie. My views on Microsoft are biased. But keep this in mind. I have used Windows since version 3.11 back in the Pentium Classic day and until a few years ago, thought it was unbeatable. Of course, after a few days of experimenting with Linux on an old computer and two years of switching between Linux and Windows as my Operating System of choice, I settled down with Linux.
I am not presenting you with my reasons against Vista to convert you to Linux. I don't care what OS you use. I just revel in the fact that I am no longer a victim of the Microsoft monopoly and hope everyone realized they actually have a choice other than what is pre-installed on your next Dell computer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
knight0334
Rated XXX
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Posts: 2234
Location: Neither Here, Nor There
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dadx2mj
Happy Camper
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 2994
Location: SoCal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doctor Feelgood
Arrrrghh!
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 20349
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:17:42 Post Subject: |
|
|
Very cool... well done!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
acruxksa
Doh!
Joined: 17 Oct 2003
Posts: 1051
Location: The Cradle of Storms
|
| Posted: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:19:43 Post Subject: |
|
|
Not to throw a fly in the ointment, but my laptop battery times were nearly identical between Window MCE and Vista RC1. Anywhere from 3H45M to 4h45M depending on what i was doing. Battery times may be slightly less with Vista, but it wasn't enough for me to take notice.
The only way I'll be "buying" Vista is with a free upgrade from the next copy of Windows MCE I buy.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spire
Hall Pass B!tch!!!
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 2165
Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska
|
| Posted: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:37:53 Post Subject: |
|
|
I have had the opportunity (thanks to Knight) to play with Vista.
It is bloat, it is resource hungry, its BEAUTIFUL, it is the future.
XP was slammed and battered when it first came out as a resource hog also. When XP became available my pentium 100 with 32 MB of ram was suffering and needed a ton of the bloat shut off to run respectfully.
My machines evolved and XP became simple to run.
I have installed a total of 4 different Linux OSes and only got frustrated each time. I blame this on my 38 years being on this planet and inability to learn a whole new language just to check email, browse Bigbruin, and play a few games.
If I was "back in the day" I would very much be on the cutting edge of Linux and all about it.
HOWEVER, most of the world will find Vista installed on their next Dell, Best Buy, Circuit City puirchased machine and will oogle and fondle it like it is GOD.
This I cannot prevent.
I now return to my plasma, PPV and Whiskey...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeerCheeze
*hick*
Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 9285
Location: At the Bar
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
Blue|Fusion
Rated XXX
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 441
Location: Cleveland, OH
|
| Posted: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:59:17 Post Subject: |
|
|
| Dr. EvilCheeze wrote: | While I'm not on the Vista bandwagon, the writer of that article has a axe to grind, and is simply wrong in several cases.
Being a fanboi of anything isn't good, and that author is a serious Linux fanboi. |
What several cases am I rong about and what's wrong with being a fanboi of anything? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeerCheeze
*hick*
Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 9285
Location: At the Bar
|
| Posted: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:17:51 Post Subject: |
|
|
| Blue|Fusion wrote: | | Dr. EvilCheeze wrote: | While I'm not on the Vista bandwagon, the writer of that article has a axe to grind, and is simply wrong in several cases.
Being a fanboi of anything isn't good, and that author is a serious Linux fanboi. |
What several cases am I rong about and what's wrong with being a fanboi of anything? |
Fanboi = bad. Because you are not being objective. There are PLENTY of problems with Vista, and because you're too busy being a Fanboi you miss many of them, and instead do nothing but compare it against Linux.
You need to look into the Security more, their are a lot more security features built into Vista than "Onecare". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blue|Fusion
Rated XXX
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 441
Location: Cleveland, OH
|
| Posted: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:37:01 Post Subject: |
|
|
So I'm subjective. I bet Bill never wrote an article about Linux without comparing it to Windows. And maybe there are other security features than the One Care stuff, but even so, Microsoft is still using the base kernel they have used since Windows 95 and built on top of it, which means still uncorrected flaws, massive additions of code, and little remval of old code, which makes for a very bulky OS which even a large team of developers obviously have problems with as it's been delayed how long? And as it gets bigger and bigger, there's more chances of flaws and security holes and makes it harder and harder for them to find and fix a problem.
_________________
5 home-built PCs, ASUS A6Jc Laptop, and a PowerEdge 2650 - all running Gentoo. Now if only I can get a car and plane to run it. Take a look at my Gallery! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
