View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Spire Hall Pass B!tch!!!
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 2165 Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
T-shirt Rated XXX
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 795 Location: Snohomish, WA USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeerCheeze *hick*
Joined: 14 Jun 2003 Posts: 9285 Location: At the Bar
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
knight0334 Rated XXX
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 2234 Location: Neither Here, Nor There
|
Posted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:51:17 Post Subject: |
|
|
Dr. EvilCheeze wrote: | Like T said...
One thing to note... Raid 5 is pretty slow. Because of the overhead of calculating the parity. |
Unless you get one of the top end SCSI cards from Adaptec or Mylex. My ld (now DSMF's) 3400S would do RAID5 with nearly the same throughput as RAID0. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dud3! Forum abandoner
Joined: 21 Aug 2003 Posts: 1469 Location: Florida
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spire Hall Pass B!tch!!!
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 2165 Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeerCheeze *hick*
Joined: 14 Jun 2003 Posts: 9285 Location: At the Bar
|
Posted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:10:54 Post Subject: |
|
|
No, 5 is never faster than 1 or 0. Doesn't matter the controller or the drives. If you compare apples to apples, you will always lose speed with RAID 5. RAID 5 is used to allow large storage with no down time. It is not designed for speed.
Think about it...
RAID 0 - The controller simply splits the data into multiple drives. Little to no intelligence involved.
RAID 1 - The controller simply writes the same data twice. Again, little to no intelligence involved.
RAID 5 - The controller has to write the data across multiple drives, keeping track of what it has written Do the math on it and the write another bit on the other drive to make the parity either even or odd, depending on the setup.
Here is how RAID 5 works. Let's say you have 5 drives, and one is the parity drive, so you are writing across 4 drives. Let's say it's using even parity. So when you do a write on the drive let's just say it write:
Drive 1: 0
Drive 2: 0
Drive 3: 1
Drive 4: 1
It now has to do the math, 0+0+1+1 = 2 or EVEN so on drive 5 it would write a 0.
Now reading from RAID 5 isn't too bad, but again lot's of overhead having to reassemble all that. However when you lose a drive... it is a LOT slower. Because it has to read everything into it's buffer, do the math and add the missing bit. But... you're still up and operational even after a HDD failure.
Last edited by BeerCheeze on Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:33:27; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
Dud3! Forum abandoner
Joined: 21 Aug 2003 Posts: 1469 Location: Florida
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spire Hall Pass B!tch!!!
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 2165 Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
T-shirt Rated XXX
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 795 Location: Snohomish, WA USA
|
Posted: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:27:57 Post Subject: |
|
|
Dr. EvilCheeze wrote: | .........
Here is how RAID 5 works. Let's say you have 5 drives, and one is the parity drive, so you are writing across 4 drives. Let's say it's using even parity. So when you do a write on the drive let's just say it write:
Drive 1: 0
Drive 2: 0
Drive 3: 1
Drive 4: 1
It now has to do the math, 0+0+1+1 = 2 or EVEN so on drive 5 it would write a 0. ........... |
One small edit/clarfication to EC's post
the parity is distributed among the drives as well, which is what makes it 100% after a single drive failure.
Also with a 'smart' caching controller drives it is nearly as fast as ATA100, and allowed true hot swapping of drives, while making more effiencent uses of drive space than RAID1
Remember it was designed for fast (at the time) but expensive SCSI drive arrays. With ATA133 and even Faster S-ata drives at almost throwaway prices and consumer grade/priced controllers that allow hot-swapping and/or hot spares RAID 5 is not really needed in small stand alone servers.
AC&NC has a good explaination of the pros and cons of each raid level |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|