Bigbruin.com
Home :: Reviews & Articles ::
Forum :: Info :: :: Facebook :: Youtube :: RSS Feed
Search  :: Register :: Log in
Raid 5 Capacity
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bigbruin.com Forum Index -> Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Spire
Hall Pass B!tch!!!


Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 2165
Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska

PostPosted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:04    Post Subject: Raid 5 Capacity Reply with quote View Single Post

If I use 3 80 gig drives in Raid 5 array, what will my total capacity be??? (Disregard formatting losses)

80 gig???
160 gig???
240 gig???

I understand the fact that parity is stored on a different drive, but what will the total be??

I sent the 2 80 deathstars back, and am looking at getting 3 different SATA drives.

80's or 120's????
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Little Bruin
Boo Boo

Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket
T-shirt
Rated XXX


Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Posts: 795
Location: Snohomish, WA USA

PostPosted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:36:11    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

you'd end up with 160Gb's of usable space.
RAID distributes the parity on all the drives in the array.
data is totally recoverable, even after the loss of one drive but uses one drive worth of space
As far as size, shop by price, I'm sure you'll be able to fill the space.
you might actually want to by 4, with one as a spare
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BeerCheeze
*hick*


Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 9285
Location: At the Bar

PostPosted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:25:44    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

Like T said...

One thing to note... Raid 5 is pretty slow. Because of the overhead of calculating the parity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
knight0334
Rated XXX


Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Posts: 2234
Location: Neither Here, Nor There

PostPosted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:51:17    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

Dr. EvilCheeze wrote:
Like T said...

One thing to note... Raid 5 is pretty slow. Because of the overhead of calculating the parity.


Unless you get one of the top end SCSI cards from Adaptec or Mylex. My ld (now DSMF's) 3400S would do RAID5 with nearly the same throughput as RAID0.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dud3!
Forum abandoner


Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 1469
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:28:09    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

Why 5 Spire?
_________________
Due to a not-that-interesting turn of events, I am now known as Justin Danger.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Spire
Hall Pass B!tch!!!


Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 2165
Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska

PostPosted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:02:21    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

Faster than 1 and safer than 0, I guess.

I was not aware of the speed hit for level 5. I realize it would be slower than 0 but should still be faster than 1 right???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BeerCheeze
*hick*


Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 9285
Location: At the Bar

PostPosted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:10:54    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

No, 5 is never faster than 1 or 0. Doesn't matter the controller or the drives. If you compare apples to apples, you will always lose speed with RAID 5. RAID 5 is used to allow large storage with no down time. It is not designed for speed.

Think about it...

RAID 0 - The controller simply splits the data into multiple drives. Little to no intelligence involved.

RAID 1 - The controller simply writes the same data twice. Again, little to no intelligence involved.

RAID 5 - The controller has to write the data across multiple drives, keeping track of what it has written Do the math on it and the write another bit on the other drive to make the parity either even or odd, depending on the setup.

Here is how RAID 5 works. Let's say you have 5 drives, and one is the parity drive, so you are writing across 4 drives. Let's say it's using even parity. So when you do a write on the drive let's just say it write:

Drive 1: 0
Drive 2: 0
Drive 3: 1
Drive 4: 1

It now has to do the math, 0+0+1+1 = 2 or EVEN so on drive 5 it would write a 0.

Now reading from RAID 5 isn't too bad, but again lot's of overhead having to reassemble all that. However when you lose a drive... it is a LOT slower. Because it has to read everything into it's buffer, do the math and add the missing bit. But... you're still up and operational even after a HDD failure.


Last edited by BeerCheeze on Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:33:27; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Little Bruin
Boo Boo

Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket
Dud3!
Forum abandoner


Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 1469
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:28:07    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

That's why I asked why he wanted 5, it's not something you use for a home computer. Is this for you server Spire? In that case....
_________________
Due to a not-that-interesting turn of events, I am now known as Justin Danger.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Spire
Hall Pass B!tch!!!


Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 2165
Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska

PostPosted: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 01:09:56    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

Yea this would be for SPIRESERVER that doesn't exist yet.

The Raptors in RAID 0 are working JUUUUST fine in SPIREMACHINE!!!!

Thanks for the info EC!!!

In raid 1, 2x80's =80
In RAID 5, 3x80's =160

Having 80 gig of backed up data isn't enough. So I guess I have to figure out if I get 2x160's or 3x80's then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
T-shirt
Rated XXX


Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Posts: 795
Location: Snohomish, WA USA

PostPosted: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:27:57    Post Subject: Reply with quote View Single Post

Dr. EvilCheeze wrote:
.........
Here is how RAID 5 works. Let's say you have 5 drives, and one is the parity drive, so you are writing across 4 drives. Let's say it's using even parity. So when you do a write on the drive let's just say it write:

Drive 1: 0
Drive 2: 0
Drive 3: 1
Drive 4: 1

It now has to do the math, 0+0+1+1 = 2 or EVEN so on drive 5 it would write a 0. ...........


One small edit/clarfication to EC's post
the parity is distributed among the drives as well, which is what makes it 100% after a single drive failure.


Also with a 'smart' caching controller drives it is nearly as fast as ATA100, and allowed true hot swapping of drives, while making more effiencent uses of drive space than RAID1
Remember it was designed for fast (at the time) but expensive SCSI drive arrays. With ATA133 and even Faster S-ata drives at almost throwaway prices and consumer grade/priced controllers that allow hot-swapping and/or hot spares RAID 5 is not really needed in small stand alone servers.
AC&NC has a good explaination of the pros and cons of each raid level
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bigbruin.com Forum Index -> Hardware All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
Contact Us :: On Facebook :: On Youtube :: Newsletter :: RSS Feed :: FAQ :: Links :: Sponsors :: Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2000 - 2023 Bigbruin.com - All rights reserved