| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Doctor Feelgood
Arrrrghh!
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 20349
Location: New Jersey
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
Chicago Wine Geek
Rated PG
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 14
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JimBowy
Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2003
Posts: 1627
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doctor Feelgood
Arrrrghh!
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 20349
Location: New Jersey
|
 Posted: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:44:31 Post Subject: |
  |
|
| Chicago Wine Geek wrote: | | Why did you like SyncBack SE better? |
It has tons of features, and will backup the files as is, not as one archive file. Incremental backups just overwrote files as necessary and didn't make additional archive files to go with the main archive file.
Was just really convenient to me... had a nice scheduler, tons of advanced options, and it did things with ftp. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Modulok
Rated XXX
Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 2120
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:00:44 Post Subject: |
|
|
ghost still exists...symantec ghost
acronis backups data to an image file...you can do specific files to one image. then you can run the program to restore files you want, or you can mount the image to a virtual drive and read/write to the image file.
syncback is great like BB says with it doing file backups and can tell if the file has been updated. syncback has a free edition as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doctor Feelgood
Arrrrghh!
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 20349
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:04:42 Post Subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
