| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| heylinder Rated XXX
 
  
 Joined: 04 Aug 2003
 Posts: 1938
 Location: Georgia
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:27:31    Post Subject: Camera Question |     |  
				| 
 |  
				| Anyone know of a point and shoot camera that shoots in 300 ppi? I realize that you can easily print anything in 300 ppi but this photo contest that I want to enter requires the photo itself be 300 ppi uncompressed. 
 I tried calling Canon (my camera is an A530) and Staples (company running contest) and got no helpful info. Actually Staples said I needed to get a "high end camera". I ask them how many amateur photographers they knew had high end cameras :rolleyes:
 
 
 BTW, my 5 mega pixel shoots in 180 ppi.
 
 Thanks for any suggestions
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Little Bruin Boo Boo
 
 Joined: 07 Apr 2003
 Posts: 667
 Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket
 |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| BeerCheeze *hick*
 
  
 Joined: 14 Jun 2003
 Posts: 9285
 Location: At the Bar
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| T-shirt Rated XXX
 
 
 Joined: 22 Aug 2003
 Posts: 795
 Location: Snohomish, WA USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:19:37    Post Subject: |     |  
				| 
 |  
				| If this is your contest (long post, solution at the bottom)
http://hometownviews.dja.com/HomePage.html
 I'd say the person who wrote the rules has spent far too much time with the easybutton
   according to their FAQ you will need at least a 10.8 megapixel camera to get 300PPI at 12"x18" (the only print size I see mentioned in the entry form which is for the poster reward given to all entrants)
 However, as EC correctly points out, Print PPI is determined by megapixels of the image divide by the print size in inches.
 so any 'jpg submited  final ppi resolution will vary according to the print size.
 I'm sure what the really want are images that are reproducable for their promotioal purposes, posters, flyers and ads and 300 dpi is standard for those processes.
 they trying to avoid submissions of celphone and webcam "quality" photos. But theoretically a 300x300 pixel photo would meet the letter of the rules if printed at 1"x1"
 
 The reason Canon cameras  optimize and mark their images as 180 or 240 PPI is........because canon photo printers are made to produce 240 PPI pictures.
 
 To make your pictures read as 300 ppi you will need to resample them via photo editing software (with possible loss of actual picture quality
  ) This explains it better than I can
 http://www.steves-digicams.com/techcorner/January_2005.html
 
 BTW good luck on the trip to iceland
  (I was only there for a few hours in december one year, at the airport in a blizzard, when the plane broke down, outside looked like an un-defrosted freezer without the food  ) |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| heylinder Rated XXX
 
  
 Joined: 04 Aug 2003
 Posts: 1938
 Location: Georgia
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:55:35    Post Subject: |     |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 Yes and I agree!
 
 
 
 
 I've already tried that with Adobe Photoshop. Staples site kicks it back out because they say it's compressed
   
 
 I don't really care about the trip ... I just want the fame
    |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| heylinder Rated XXX
 
  
 Joined: 04 Aug 2003
 Posts: 1938
 Location: Georgia
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:58:40    Post Subject: |     |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Dr. EvilCheeze wrote: |  	  | What size does the picture have to be? 
 (Width inches x 300 ppi) x (Length inches x 300 ppi) = Number of megapixels
 
 Example: To shoot a high quality 5”x7” image
 
 (5” x 300 ppi) x (7” x 300 ppi) = 1,500 x 2,100 = 3,150,000, or about 3.2 megapixels
 | 
 
 It has to be large enough to print out a poster size. I hate to put the money into a 10 megapixel camera when I'd rather put it into my bug
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| T-shirt Rated XXX
 
 
 Joined: 22 Aug 2003
 Posts: 795
 Location: Snohomish, WA USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:36:14    Post Subject: |     |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | heylinder wrote: |  	  | 
 
 
 I've already tried that with Adobe Photoshop. Staples site kicks it back out because they say it's compressed
   
 
 I don't really care about the trip ... I just want the fame
    | 
 
 That might be the way adobe saves it, but resampling is not compression. You should find a setting in Photoshop for save as "uncompressed jpeg" in
 settings
 The contest rules seem aimed at the very high end consumer/semi-pro photographer, yet staples doesn't come to my mind as a real camera shop. I know their trying to promote  their new big poster printers, but the message is confused.
 
 Hey, we know you here, that should be fame enough for anybody.
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| heylinder Rated XXX
 
  
 Joined: 04 Aug 2003
 Posts: 1938
 Location: Georgia
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:24:45    Post Subject: |     |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | T-shirt wrote: |  	  | 
 Hey, we know you here, that should be fame enough for anybody.
  | 
 
 Oh Lord ... I'm in trouble
   
 Anyways, someone else suggested I do this ... After taking your pic's in large super fine, open the pic in PS, resize the image by changing the long side to 5500, resample with the resolution set to 302? "just for good measure" so it is at least 300ppi?
 
 It worked! I'm in
   
 Thanks for all your help. I will look for that "save as uncompressed jpeg" thou
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Little Bruin Boo Boo
 
 Joined: 07 Apr 2003
 Posts: 667
 Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket
 |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |