Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 795 Location: Snohomish, WA USA
Posted: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 22:01:30 Post Subject:
I know he said in the 2000 campaign
"I will never use the military for nation building"
yet when the WMD didn't show up( big suprise )
suddenly nation building (if you can call the choas in Iraq ' building') that was his reason for being there.
Now the draft/noDraft/backdoor draft is becoming reality (see the guy from HI and the national guard guy having to sue to be released from their apperently illegal recalls to service)
and the biggest marine battle since hue city, vietnam, is being waged.
Do you think anyone is better off?
and do you think it will get better?
Joined: 08 Jun 2003 Posts: 2176 Location: Twin cities,MN
Posted: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 22:14:23 Post Subject:
NO, I do not think President Bush lied!!! I think HE HAD THE BALLS that Clinton SHOULD have had!!!! Hell, Clinton was offered Bin Laden and REFUSED!!
President Bush had THE SAME INTEL that Clinton had and Clinton AGREED that Sadam had WMD!!! So, how did President Bush lie?? EXPLAIN THAT TO ME!!!
President Bush DID serve! OK, so it was in the Natl Guard! Big whoop-di-do..........At least he didn't serve with his own agenda/camera crew to viedo his **cough** actions **cough**. With plans to Subvert/Undermine the truly patriotic Americans that were in that war. At least he didn't commit TRAITORIOUS actions WITH the ENEMY!!!!
I'm sorry NA...don't get me going on this. I TRULY FEEL THAT, THAT S*NOFAB!TCH kerry SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON!!!!! _________________ Two wrongs don't make a right!
But, three lefts do!!
All times are GMT - 4 Hours Go To Page Previous1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum