View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dfran Rated NC-17
Joined: 27 Feb 2005 Posts: 130 Location: Vermont
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
Modulok Rated XXX
Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 2120 Location: New Jersey
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JimBowy Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2003 Posts: 1627
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hellfire Rated XXX
Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 3473
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
acruxksa Doh!
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 1051 Location: The Cradle of Storms
|
Posted: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:16:45 Post Subject: |
|
|
Dr. EvilCheeze wrote: | Additional note, that as far as I know other than PC Power & Cooling all PSU makers rate their PSU's at max power under a temp of 25C. Which is way cooler than it will really be used at. When you up the temp, you lower the out put. |
fwiw,
Corsairs HX series (mfg by seasonic) are rated at 50c.
drfan,
I've read reports of people getting their GTS's and in some cases GTX's to work on psu's that would seem under rated for the job. The problem is that determining whether a psu has enough juice can be a very spotty prospect. Just because one persons 480W neo power works is no guarantee that another persons will also work. As Cheezy said, operating temp can play a big role in this. People usually sidestep the issue by buying more power than they actually need. System mfg's are able to get away with lower wattage psu's because they are able to test their systems and know exactly how much current draw they use as well as what temps their psu's operate at when running in the system. If you're confident it's not your psu, you might want to think about an OS wipe and re-install. Sometimes driver cleaner isn't enough.
*edit*
Just thought of something, what happens if you put your 6800gt back in the system? Have you tried a different driver? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
edvallie Put Beer Here
Joined: 07 Aug 2005 Posts: 1255 Location: Computer
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dfran Rated NC-17
Joined: 27 Feb 2005 Posts: 130 Location: Vermont
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
Modulok Rated XXX
Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 2120 Location: New Jersey
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dfran Rated NC-17
Joined: 27 Feb 2005 Posts: 130 Location: Vermont
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeerCheeze *hick*
Joined: 14 Jun 2003 Posts: 9285 Location: At the Bar
|
Posted: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:27:04 Post Subject: |
|
|
Yea, 64 bit XP sucks... I know I run it.
600W for 2 8800GTS's... I wouldn't. If I were to look at that math again 26A * 2 = 52A. The 600W is 49A.
Heck if you look at the site, the quad 750 is the one certified for the 8800GTX's, so that would be the one I'd go with.
System Requirements:
Quote: | FEAR -
* Windows 2000/XP
* Pentium III 1.8 Ghz
* 512MB RAM
* 64MB DirectX 9.0 video card
* 16X CDROM
* DirectX 9.0 compatible sound card
* Keyboard
* Mouse
|
Quote: | Oblivion-
* Windows XP
* Pentium 2Ghz
* 512MB RAM
* 128MB DirectX 9.0 video card
* 8x DVDROM
* DirectX 9 compatible sound card
* Keyboard
* Mouse
|
So... any questions on which one uses more "juice" from the system? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|