Kilamon
Rated XXX
|
 Posted: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:34:29 Post Subject: |
 |
|
Maybe I should rephrase the question. Basically, with all the statistics that are put out by reviewers for motherboards, why hasn't anyone aggregated these results in to a chart that displays the primary differences and/or benefits that an individual system board provides along with any metrics that may have been gathered, especially when the metrics are based off the same performance tests using the same components for the testing? This could make the choice of a system board much easier than looking at 30 different reviews, trying to decipher a manufacturers codes to determine why they have extreme (how 90s!) vs UD4PXAF, making sure you have the right RAM, and etc..
Personally, since the core is the same across the boards, I should think that the choice is influenced more by the ram type/speed now. |
|
