| View Single Post |
Topic: obscure memory error, any ideas/thoughts? |
| Author |
Message |
edvallie
Rated XXX
|
 Posted: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:34:12 Post Subject: |
 |
|
Maybe there's a problem with the dual channel data exchange that's going on. Do you have a third memory slot where you can use both memory sticks and keep them out of dual channel?
Here's what Test 5 Does, If you were curious
| Quote: | | This test stresses memory by using block move (movsl) instructions and is based on Robert Redelmeier's burnBX test. Memory is initialized with shifting patterns that are inverted every 8 bytes. Then 4mb blocks of memory are moved around using the movsl instruction. After the moves are completed the data patterns are checked. Because the data is checked only after the memory moves are completed it is not possible to know where the error occurred. The addresses reported are only for where the bad pattern was found. Since the moves are constrained to a 8mb segment of memory the failing address will always be less than 8mb away from the reported address. Errors from this test are not used to calculate BadRAM patterns. |
_________________
ABAP? What did you call me? |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
