BeerCheeze
Rated XXX
|
 Posted: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:07:12 Post Subject: |
 |
|
I'm just trying to figure out by what is said in the title, the article, and the benchies... how this all makes sense.
It seems to me that in a lot of ways the EE beats dual Xeon's, and is cheaper than the dual Xeon's he uses in the test. He says that Dual 2.8's are cheaper than 1 EE, but then he uses Dual 3.06's in his benchmarks??  Either way, those benchmarks are all over the place... I see NO clear cut winner. |
|
