View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
acruxksa Doh!
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 1051 Location: The Cradle of Storms
|
Posted: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:21:55 Post Subject: |
|
|
grumpyboy wrote: | ...............................
..............................................
Is a 400 host clock x 7 @ 2800 mhz cpu @ 800 mhz memory bus speed better than a..
300 host clock x 9 @ 3000 mhz cpu @ 677 mhz memory speed ? |
I think 9x333 would be slightly better in benchmarks, but you wouldn't notice a difference in real world performance.
Try 8x400. You should be able to hit 3.2Ghz easily, just keep an eye on temps and if you notice that they are constantly over 60c when loaded get a better HSF solution. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little Bruin
Boo Boo
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 667
Location: Pic-A-Nic Basket |
|
|
grumpyboy Rated PG
Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 19 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:21:20 Post Subject: |
|
|
ok thanks im going to get a proper cooler anyhow sigh another 60 bucks gone plus enough noise to wake the dead
thanks for the advice |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|