| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which Should I Get? |
| Barton 2500+ @ $80 US |
|
100% |
[ 8 ] |
| Thoroughbred 2600+ @ $95 US |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Thoroughbred 2700+ @ $125 US |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 8 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Jason Arrrrghh!

Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 18043 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 09:18:47 Post Subject: Which Would Be My Best Bet? |
|
|
I want a new cpu, and don't want to spend tons right now... But, I'd like a 333 MHz fsb'ed chip, with hopes of running it at 400 MHz.
I currently have a XP2200+ that I got as high as 362 MHz fsb, and I'm looking at the choices in my poll... Any opinions? _________________ Sometimes I laugh so hard that the tears run down my leg!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
dadx2mj Happy Camper

Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Posts: 2994 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:17:51 Post Subject: |
|
|
| I upgraded my 1700+ TBred to a 2500+ Barton and have been very happy with it. I have mine running at 2250 Mhz (12.5x180)and think the PC 2700 is holding me back some. For the price I dont think you can go wrong with the Barton. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spire Hall Pass B!tch!!!

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 2165 Location: Up to my Nipples in Alaska
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:38:41 Post Subject: |
|
|
I'm running my Barton at 200 x 11.5 for 2300Mhz. Excellent chip, and the additional cache is a huge bonus.
Get the Barton |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BeerCheeze *hick*

Joined: 14 Jun 2003 Posts: 9284 Location: At the Bar
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 12:27:49 Post Subject: |
|
|
No contest... Barton. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IceNine *The Freshest*

Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1459 Location: Bel Air
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 13:58:25 Post Subject: |
|
|
The 2400+ Barton has a higher clock speed. _________________
A letter to a soldier |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Arrrrghh!

Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 18043 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 14:11:55 Post Subject: |
|
|
| IceNine wrote: | | The 2400+ Barton has a higher clock speed. |
- Haven't seen one of them... 2400+ Thoroughbred does have a higher clock than a Barton 2500+, but I'd like to see what you're talking about!! _________________ Sometimes I laugh so hard that the tears run down my leg!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IceNine *The Freshest*

Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1459 Location: Bel Air
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 14:17:03 Post Subject: |
|
|
Woops, made the mistake of throwing "Barton" in there. LOL. The 2400+ has a higher initial clockspeed. I'd go with it unless you're going to overclock. _________________
A letter to a soldier |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Arrrrghh!

Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 18043 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 14:21:09 Post Subject: |
|
|
But... the 2400+ is a 266 fsb chip right? There isn't a 333 version, is there?
I want a 333 fsb chip, in hopes of getting to 400. I'd buy a stock 400 fsb chip, but they are too beaucoup... $$$ _________________ Sometimes I laugh so hard that the tears run down my leg!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IceNine *The Freshest*

Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1459 Location: Bel Air
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:01:30 Post Subject: |
|
|
Hm... I thought there was a 333 2400, but I can't find one. I found a 2600+ though with 333. It's 2.13 GHz Proc. $90 _________________
A letter to a soldier |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Arrrrghh!

Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 18043 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:09:34 Post Subject: |
|
|
Yeah, it was between the 2600+ thoroughbred and 2500+ barton really, but I made the poll include those two and the 2700+ just in case there was something special with them... _________________ Sometimes I laugh so hard that the tears run down my leg!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|